Measured 2026-10-24 · 376 rated records / 399 public records.
| Primary metro | Rated listings | Below 4.0 | 4.0–4.49 | 4.5–4.79 | 4.8–5.0 | Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas City | 104 | 5 | 6 | 23 | 70 | 4.9 |
| Tulsa | 40 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 21 | 4.8 |
| Oklahoma City | 65 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 41 | 4.8 |
| Wichita | 18 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 4.8 |
| Omaha | 16 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 4.9 |
| St. Louis | 36 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 28 | 4.8 |
| Des Moines | 14 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 4.8 |
| Springfield | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 4.9 |
| Lincoln | 12 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4.9 |
| Northwest Arkansas | 37 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 29 | 4.9 |
| Columbia | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.9 |
| Topeka | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4.8 |
How this was measured
Distinct place IDs from 40 searches; positive review counts and ratings grouped by the record’s primary metro. Repeated search rows are not extra reviews.
Download the underlying company CSV · Full method and null handling
What this cannot tell you
Search wording, result limits and office locations shape this sample. A high rating does not isolate foundation work, prove review authenticity or predict a successful repair. Metros with small samples are especially uncertain.
Compare contractors in your metro. Use the statement sources on each record and ask the contractor for current written terms.