Measured 2026-10-27 · 32 documented terms / 115 reviewed websites.
| Primary metro | Websites reviewed | Published term | Share | Unreviewed / blocked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas City | 27 | 11 | 41% | 88 |
| Tulsa | 10 | 1 | 10% | 30 |
| Oklahoma City | 9 | 2 | 22% | 60 |
| Wichita | 10 | 3 | 30% | 8 |
| Omaha | 6 | 1 | 17% | 10 |
| St. Louis | 18 | 5 | 28% | 19 |
| Des Moines | 7 | 1 | 14% | 7 |
| Springfield | 5 | 1 | 20% | 5 |
| Lincoln | 3 | 1 | 33% | 12 |
| Northwest Arkansas | 11 | 4 | 36% | 30 |
| Columbia | 5 | 1 | 20% | 9 |
| Topeka | 4 | 1 | 25% | 6 |
How this was measured
Primary company-page statements interpreted into a nullable warrantyTerm field; only an explicit duration or lifetime term counts. Sources and check dates accompany each field. Company statements are not independently verified contract coverage.
Download the underlying company CSV · Full method and null handling
What this cannot tell you
The website pass prioritizes firms in the frozen ranked edition, so it is not a random market sample. Warranty statements may apply only to one service, product or installation date. Lifetime wording can have transfer and coverage restrictions; this study does not evaluate claims handling.
Compare contractors in your metro. Use the statement sources on each record and ask the contractor for current written terms.